We have a new colleague in the neighborhood these days. The Daily News reports that St. Cecelia's Parish is now being served by Rev. James Kirsche, who's just home from serving in Iraq.
The headline "The Cell Tolls for St. Cecilia Church" piqued my curiosity since I've tried looking into acquiring a cell tower for our church (for those of you who have been to our building, this might bring a slight hint of laughter or perhaps desperation since...well...since we don't have a steeple and we're only two stories high). But it's part of the article itself that's stuck in my craw. The gist of the story is familiar - a historic church has fallen on hard times and is now looking to [fill in money-making activity here] to help pay the bills. In this case, it's a cell tower, but other churches find other ways. It's a standard-issue filler story that usually ends up in the Sunday edition. And within the story is the same old tired quote
"A parish trustee summarized the situation with a single word yesterday morning.
'Struggling.'
He added, 'The young people don't come any more.'"
The author then illustrates this point by noting that at a recent 8:15am prayer service, "The only youthful figure was the pastor himself."
I'm tired of always blaming the young people who "don't come any more." Instead of blaming them, why doesn't the church (and by "the church" I don't mean St. Cecelia's but rather the wider church) ask itself, "gee, why don't young people come to church anymore." And don't go off blaming culture or society or Sunday morning soccer matches.
When I arrived here, several folks told me with a sad, bewildered sigh that "the young people don't come any more." The problem, we discovered, is that NO HAD ONE INVITED THEM. And even at that, FEW INCLUDED THEM.
Look, it's no secret that the church is made up primarily of older folks. But how many churches "allow" young people to actually be on their committees, their boards, their consistories? How many empower young people to actually make decisions on behalf of the congregation? How many put their trust into the hands of young people and say, "you know what? maybe we're past our prime, we'll be here to mentor and guide you in the faith, but you have to figure out how to make the coffee, pay for the heat and teach Sunday school to the young kids." How many historic churches say "yes" to the ideas of young people?
We are primarily a congregation of people under the age of 50, with most being in their 30s and 40s. This in churchland is "young" by most standards. But we only ended up this way because older folks saw fit to give up some of their power and bestow it upon the next generation and the generation following that one.
You want young people in your church? The first step is to pray that God will send you some. Then go out and do your part -invite them. The next step is to listen to their ideas on ways to reach out to other young people. Then empower the young folks you have to implement their ideas. And when things start happening and young people start coming, don't relegate them just to the happy-clappy praise and worship service. No, integrate them into the full life and ministry of the congregation. And once and for all - stop blaming young people for not wanting to come to YOUR church. As long as it's YOUR church, they won't want to come. It has to be OUR church - yours and theirs - in order for a church to grow in a multigenerational and healthy way.
P.S. - and a big frirendly welcome to Rev. Kirsche. If you're reading this, I hope you'll be pleased to discover that by virtue of your age you are the elder statesmen among the clergy in our neighborhood. All the Protestant clergy as well as the Muslim Imam are all under the age of 35.